SIX THINGS THE US DEPT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY   42 comments

The story of Common Core and data mining begins as most stories do, with a huge, unmet need.

Self-appointed “stakeholder” know-it-alls at the federal level (also at state, corporate, and even university levels) determined that they had the right, and the need, for open access to personal student data– more so than they already had.

They needed state school systems to voluntarily agree to common data core standards AND to common learning standards to make data comparisons easy. They didn’t care what the standards were, as teachers and parents and students do; they only cared that the standards would be the same across the nation.

So, without waiting around for a proper vote, they did it. The CEDS (Common Education Data Standards) were created by the same people who created and copyrighted Common Core: the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). No surprise.

CEDS common elements

Because the federal “need” to control schools and data was and is illegal and unconstitutional –the federal government “needed” to do (and did) at least six sneaky things.

SIX SNEAKY THINGS THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY:

1. Sneaky Thing Number One: It bribed the states with ARRA Stimulus monies to build 50 linkable, twinlike State Longitudinal Database Systems (SLDS). This act created a virtual national database.

These SLDS’s had to be interoperable within states and outside states with a State Interoperability Framework. Utah, for example, accepted $9.6 million to create Utah’s SLDS. Think about it. All states have an SLDS, and they are built to be interoperable. How is this not a de facto national database?

2. Sneaky Thing Number Two: It altered the (previously privacy-protective) federal FERPA (Family Educational Rights Privacy Act) law to make access to personally identifiable student data –including biological and behavioral data– “legal”.

So now, the act of requiring parental consent (to share personally identifiable information) has been reduced from a requirement to just a “best practice” according to the altered federal FERPA regulations.

Best practice FERPA

For more information on this, study the lawsuit against the Department of Education by the Electronic Information Privacy Center (EPIC).

The Department of Ed also altered FERPA’s definitions of terms, including what would be defined as “personally identifiable information”.

Biometric Definition FEDERAL

So personally identifiable, shareable information now includes biometric information, (which is behavioral and biological information) collected via testing, palm scanning or iris scanning, or any other means. Schools have not been told that the information they submit to the state SLDS systems are vulnerable to federal and corporate perusal. Legislators write bills that call for the testing of behavioral indicators– but have they considered how this can damage a student’s lifelong need for, and right to, privacy?

The Department of Education openly promotes schools collecting data about students’ personalities and beliefs in the report called “Promoting Grit, Tenacity and Perserverance.” This document promotes the use of facial expression cameras, posture analysis seats, wireless skin conductance sensors and other measures of students’ beliefs and emotions. See page 44.

3. Sneaky Thing Number Three: The US Department of Education partnered with private groups, including the CCSSO (that’s the Council of Chief State School Officers –copyright holders on Common Core–) to collect student data nationally.

The CCSSO, or “Superintendents’ Club” as I like to call it, is a private group with no accountability to voters. This makes it in-valid and un-American, as far as governance goes. The CCSSO has a stated mission: to disaggregate student data. Disaggregate means to take away anonymity.

CCSSO disaggregation

The CCSSO states that it has a mission to collect data nationally in partnership with the US Dept of Ed: “The Education Information Management Advisory Consortium (EIMAC) is CCSSO’s network of state education agency officials tasked with data collection and reporting; information system management and design; and assessment coordination. EIMAC advocates on behalf of states to reduce data collection burden and improve the overall quality of the data collected at the national level.

The CCSSO site states that its data collection effort is a USDOE partnership: “The Common Education Data Standards Initiative is a joint effort by CCSSO and the State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) in partnership with the United Staes Department of Education.”

(Do you recall voting for this arrangement, anyone? Anyone? –Me neither! )

4. Sneaky Thing Number Four: It used private-public partnerships to promote data linking among agencies. The Data Quality Campaign is one example. The National Data Collection Model is another example. The Common Educational Data Standards is another example.

What do these “models” really model?

Example one: from the Data Quality Campaign: “as states build and enhance K12 longitudinal data systems they continue building linkages to exchange and use information across early childhood, postsecondary and the workforce and with other critical agencies such as health, social services and criminal justice systems.”

Let that sink in: linking data from schools, medical clinics, and criminal justice systems is the goal of the Federal-to-CCSSO partnership. So nothing will be kept from any governmental agency; nothing is to be sacred or private if it is known by an SLDS serving entity (any state-funded, state-accountable school).

Example two: from the National Data Collection Model:

your child’s name
nickname
religious affiliation
birthdate
ability grouping
GPA
physical characteristics
IEP
attendance
telephone number
bus stop times
allergies
diseases
languages and dialects spoken
number of attempts at a given assignment
delinquent status
referral date
nonschool activity involvement
meal type
screen name
maternal last name
voting status
martial status
– and even cause of death.

Proponents point out that this is not mandatory federal data collection. True; not yet. But it’s a federally partnered data model and many states are following it.

5. Sneaky Thing Number Five: The Department of Ed created grants for Common Core testing and then mandated that those testing groups synchronize their tests, report fully and often to the U.S. Department of Education, share student-level data, and produce “all student-level data in a manner consistent with an industry-recognized open-licensed interoperability standard that is approved by the Department”.

So federally funded Common Core tests require Common data interoperability standards.

Check out that Cooperative Agreement document here.

But, do you think this “Agreement” information does not apply to you because your state dropped its SBAC or PARCC membership –as several states have? Think again. There is an incestuous, horrific pool of private and public organizations, all of which are VOLUNTARILY agreeing to Common Core based, technological interoperability and data collection standards!

The Data Quality Campaign lists as its partners dozens of groups– not only the CCSSO and NGA (Common Core creators), not only the College Board –which is now run by the lead architect of Common Core, David Coleman; –not only Achieve, Inc., the group that contracted with CCSSO/NGO to write the Common Core, but even the School Interoperability Framework Association, the Pell Institute (Pell Grants), Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education, American Institutes for Research (Utah’s Common Core testing provider) and many other Common Core product-providing organizations.

So virtually everyone’s doing data the same way whether they’re privately or publically funded. This should freak anybody out. It really should. We the People, individuals, are losing personal power to these public-private partnerships that cannot be un-elected and that are not subject to the transparency laws of elected offices.

6. Sneaky Thing Number Six: The Department of Education directly lied to the American Society of News Editors. In a June 2013 speech given to the American Society of News Editors, Secretary Duncan mocked the concerns of parents and educators who are fighting Common Core and its related student data mining:

A new set of standards — rigorous, high-quality learning standards, developed and led by a group of governors and state education chiefs — are under attack as a federal takeover of the schools. And your role in sorting out truth from nonsense is really important… They make.. outlandish claims. They say that the Common Core calls for federal collection of student data. For the record, we are not allowed to, and we won’t. And let’s not even get into the really wacky stuff: mind control, robots, and biometric brain mapping. This work is interesting, but frankly, not that interesting.”

Despite what the state school board and the federal Department of Education claim, corporations do know that Common Core and student data mining are interdependent.

CEO of Escholar Shawn Bay spoke at a recent White House event called “Datapalooza.” He said (see his speech on this video, at about minute 9:15) that Common Core “is the glue that actually ties everything together” for student data collection.

And President Obama himself has called his educational and data related reforms so huge that they are cradle to career” -affecting reforms. Secretary Duncan now refers to the reforms not as “K-12″ but as “p-12″ meaning preschool/prenatal. These reforms affect the most vulnerable, but not in a positive way, and certainly not with voters’ knowledge and consent.

The sneakiness and the privacy invasion isn’t just a federal wrong; there’s state-level invasion of local control, too: to be specific, our state’s robbing parents of the right to fully govern their own children.

When I asked my state school board how to opt out of having my children tracked by the State Longitudinal Database System, I was told that the answer was no. There was no way to opt out, they said: all children registered in any state school system (charters, online schools, homeschool-state hybrid programs) are tracked by the SLDS. Here’s that letter.

The Answer is No

Despite Constitutional and G.E.P.A.-law prohibitions, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan admitted that “The Obama administration has sought to fundamentally shift the federal role, so that the Department is doing much more”. Duncan also said, “America is now in the midst of a “quiet revolution” in school reform.” (Yes, it’s been so quiet that the people governed by it weren’t asked about this revolution.)

Yet, federal speeches, and scholarly research conferences and corporate marketers now openly push for common standards and common data systems. From the official White House website to federal educational grant applications to federally partnered corporate sites, to Secretary Duncan’s speeches, there are countless examples to show that the priorities of the federal government are these four things: 1) standards 2) staff 3) “robust” national data systems 4) labeling certain schools as low-achieving.

And the data product sales companies couldn’t agree more.

Common Core proponents insist that Common Core has nothing to do with data mining. But the federal government always bundles the common standards and the data systems, always. This federal push for common data standards and common education standards ought to be household knowledge. That is step number one, seeing the federal patterns and federal pushes for what they are.

EDFACTS

So, what difference does it make? I hear people say that since they have nothing to hide, they’re unconcerned about who’s tracking their children or their families without consent.

I say our founding fathers didn’t write the Constitution without inspiration.

The Constitution describes the God-given right to privacy:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

How easy will it be for those with access to the national databases to label a person as behaviorally unstable and therefore, unworthy of passing a background check for a job or for a gun purchase? How easy will it be for those with access to the databases to search and seize anything at all that they deem inappropriate, that they deem threatening, that they deem theirs?

Privacy is not properly protected by our state school systems and those who ought to know this, don’t. It’s not their fault; the truth has been carefully, quietly hidden. But widespread knowledge of the facts can –and must-- alter these facts.

Please share.

———————————————————-

Postscript: About Control

State school boards tell citizens to give them feedback on the Common Core Standards, and not to discuss anything else related to Common Core or its governance structures.

But citizens have the right to determine what will be discussed; this is America. And any discussion of the standards themselves can only be very temporarily relevant.

Why is academic argument about Common Core only temporarily relevant?

Because two private D.C. trade groups, the NGA (Governors’ club) and the CCSSO (Superintendents’ club) own the standards and have copyrighted them. They alone control the standards. The states do not; nor do the voters in the states.

Inside the state: We can alter the standards only by 15%, according to federal mandates and the writings of the private trade groups that created the standards.

Outside the state: We have no voice in future alterations to the standards. There is no written amendment process outlined for states to have a voice in “their” standards. There is no representative process. That’s why Common Core is unAmerican.

This is why we call Common Core education without representation. It is also accurate to call the education reform package citizen surveillance without warrant, as detailed above.

—————-

For a 15-minute crash-course on the connection between Common Core and student data mining, watch this video by Jane Robbins of the American Principles Project:

42 responses to “SIX THINGS THE US DEPT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. How can I share a letter I received from my state regarding the data warehouse? I would like to share it via email and not a public forum. Thanks.

  2. I would love for someone to enlighten me about the MAP testing by NWEA. My kids attend a Catholic School and they have common core written on their English and math books. I being told that the MAP test my kids took doesn’t collect data on my kids, but when I got to NWEA.org who is the one the MAP test is through it has common core written all over it? I’m just trying to figure this whole date mining thing out and find out if it’s something in my children’s school. thanks Andrea

  3. Pingback: #stopcommoncore #Agenda21- SIX THINGS THE US DEPT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY | COMMON CORE | Defendressofsanity81's Blog

  4. Wed 10-16-13 Joy Pullmann joins Tamara Scott Live at 10 am/cst to discuss DATA MINING AND COLLECTION, text and assignments verses test and assessments. Join us live at http://www.webcastonelive.com. Watch / Listen / Chat on-line / or call in at 855-244-0077. Please help me get the word to others.

  5. Pingback: Multiple States Deny Parents the Right to Opt a Child Out of SLDS Tracking | COMMON CORE

  6. For the education you were never meant to receive go to http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com — your eyes will be opened.
    And as a small taste of what’s really behind all this so-called “federal” takeover of U.S. education, you may want to start with this U.N. (W.H.O.) document and make some basic conclusions: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA66/A66_70P-en.pdf

  7. All my friends say is, the Government can get this info anyway what’s the big deal? Any words of wisdom I can give them or just give up?

    • Elizabeth, they cannot get ALL of it unless we hand it to them. If you opt your child out of school surveys and standardized testing (which you can do) they get less. If you opt out of government-funded schools completely, they get zero. If we pressure our legislators to get rid of our SLDS –State Longitudinal Database System– which tracks kids without parental consent, they’ll get zero. There’s no reason to have an SLDS that is technologically interoperable with every other state’s SLDS. We need to scrap it. Just stop! Educate your legislators on this. We are not powerless unless we believe that lie and foolishly give away our rights.

      • YES! OPT OUT OF THE TESTING!!!!!!!!!!! All it takes in Utah is a letter to the school’s testing coordinator. If enough parents OPT OUT, then the tests cannot even be given because they won’t be worth the time and expense. We should be controlled what our children learn. Not the US Department of Education.

        Louisiana Purchase
  8. Christel, I discovered this blog and was wondering if it added anything new to the conversation about federal data collecting. http://missourieducationwatchdog.blogspot.com/2013/09/common-core-standards-and-data.html#uds-search-results
    I had not seen these links before: http://www.pesc.org/ (P20W Education Standards Council) and the PESC State Core Standards Model (http://www.pesc.org/library/docs/Common%20Data%20Standards/State%20Core%20Model%2011-17.pdf) At about page 70 there is a diagram that appears to show the ultimate goal of data sharing will be global. We recently had a Louisiana state school board meeting (Board of Elementary and Secondary Education) and the Secretary of Education, John White, absolutely denied that the Federal Government was collecting data. We are having a battle here in the Bayou State. Would appreciate your comment on these links. I really appreciate all the work you have done here. It has been invaluable. Thank you so much. Carol Dufrene

  9. Pingback: SIX THINGS THE US DEPT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY | Leatherneck Blogger

  10. Hi Christel and team. I cannot find an email for you on your site, so will share details here. New Zealand is several years down the track of Common Core and if you want to see examples of indoctrination in national exams look no further than these exam papers:
    http://www.investigatemagazine.co.nz/Investigate/4636/common-core-indoctrination-of-children-surfaces-in-nz/

    I’ve written a new book with extensive coverage of Common Core and its links to a much more sinister agenda. Youtube clip on the book is below:

    Regards
    Ian Wishart

  11. “There is nothing inherently evil in the process of making money,
    and the notion is illogical, but that is one of the underlying tenets
    in our present education system. We are taught from an early age
    that making money is hard and that those who make lots of money
    are morally suspect. American culture studies programs at some of
    the nation’s leading universities have even gone so far as to teach the
    absurd and illogical notion that the rich became rich because they
    enjoy privilege earned on the backs of African slaves. Minority
    millionaires like entrepreneur Herman Cain, Earl Graves, Sr., and
    Reginald F. Lewis prove the utter nonsense of this notion, yet this
    is the illogical Progressive philosophy that has permeated our education
    system.

  12. RE: MAPP testing.

    1. New.
    2. No valid studies of validity.

  13. Great post and content on this privacy issue, thank you. Would you consider signing our petition to the President on WhiteHouse.gov and encouraging your readers and followers to sign as well? Thank you! http://wh.gov/lWKWw

  14. Pingback: CAN PARENTS OPT THEIR CHILDREN OUT OF COMMON CORE DATA MINING? | Education News

  15. Pingback: SIX THINGS THE US DEPT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY | wandaann1954

  16. Pingback: Child and Family privacy: Common Core Raises Serious Concerns | Concerned Palos Verdes Parents

  17. hSecretary of Education Arne Duncan has insulted the Moms of America and our children! This MAD group is intended to be a gathering place where America’s Moms can show him that he picked the WRONG group to mess with!

    We are hoping to mobilize an ARMY OF MOMS across our nation to send a message to Secretary Duncan and to take back local control of our schools! We are MAD: Mom’s Against Duncan!

    MAD is non-partisan and apolitical.
    ttps://www.facebook.com/groups/MomsAgainstDuncan/?hc_location=stream

  18. Pingback: “Dead Cats: Thx!, 11/27/13, (10)27: James Brody | Dead Cats & Clippings

  19. Pingback: Common Core Lies: Enron Revisited | Conversations in Boulder County

  20. Pingback: SIX THINGS THE US DEPT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY | Saint Simon Common Core Information

  21. Pingback: CA School District Sells Student Data to Fundraise for Duncan Visit | COMMON CORE

  22. Pingback: Iowa’s New Generation Science Standards Task Force Moves Ahead – Governor Steps Back | CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA

  23. Pingback: Sec. Arne Duncan Makes a Personal Visit to Utah | COMMON CORE

  24. Pingback: Call to Action – Week 4: Learn & Share | Kansans Against Common Core

  25. Pingback: New Year’s Resolution to Stop Common Core | Wyoming Against the Common Core

  26. Pingback: SIX THINGS THE US DEPT OF EDUCATION DID TO DEPRIVE YOUR CHILD OF PRIVACY

  27. This article is so clear and well-cited that I shared the link with the Superintendent of our school district, the Board and dozens of parents. Feedback has been very good!

  28. Pingback: The way I see it…

  29. Pingback: Common Core 101: What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children? | The Myrtle Beach Post

  30. Pingback: Pastor Mikes Report | Common Core 101: What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children?

  31. Pingback: Common Core 101: What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children? | Political Thrill

  32. Pingback: Common Core 101: What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children? – The News Doctors

  33. Pingback: Champion News | Common Core 101: What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children?

  34. Pingback: Common Core 101: What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children? | Sharing Liberty

  35. Pingback: Common Core 101(Enslaving Our Children): What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children? | APC Freedom Messenger

  36. Pingback: Common Core 101: What Is It and How Does It Affect Our Children? | ACGR's "News with Attitude"

  37. Pingback: What Is Common Core: 101 | COMMON CORE

  38. Pingback: Six Things the US Dept. of Ed Did To Reduce Privacy | Reclaiming Public Education 101

Comments are welcome here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,825 other followers

%d bloggers like this: