Does U.N.’s Agenda 21 Education Mandate Push Common Core in USA?   33 comments

What Does Common Core Have To Do With the U.N.’s Agenda 21 ?

 —And Why Should You Care?

  There’s an interesting article about Obama’s call for the U.S. to pay for education of the world.  It’s “A Global Fund for Education: Achieving Education for All” that you can read in full here:

Its summary states: “In order to realize the world’s commitment to ensuring education for all by 2015, important innovations and reforms will be needed in the governance and financing of global education. In 2008, Presidential Candidate Barack Obama committed to making sure that every child has the chance to learn by creating a Global Fund for Education. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has recently called for a new architecture of global cooperation…  A new Global Fund for Education… must be capable of mobilizing the approximately $7 billion annually still needed to achieve education for all, while holding all stakeholders accountable for achieving results with these resources. None of these objectives will be achieved without a major rethinking of the global education architecture and an evolution of current mechanisms for financing education… Achieving these two Millennium Development Goals, and the broader Education for All Goals… will require more capable international institutions.”

I have to ask three questions as I read this:

  • Since when do nations collectively finance global education?
  • Since when has the whole world agreed on what should be taught to the whole world?
  • Since when is the United States of America reduced to “accountable stakeholder” status over its own educational and financial decisionmaking?

So Obama created a global education fund, using U.S. taxpayer money.  I don’t remember voting on this.

And Hilary Clinton is misusing the word “inclusiveness” to now mean “no more independent sovereignty for anyone.”  Meanwhile, there’s a United Nations/UNESCO program called “Education For All” that involves the same ideas and the very same key people as “Common Core”.  And there’s also an “Education, Public Awareness and Training” chapter in the U.N.’s Agenda 21 goals.

Both the U.N.’s educational goals (via UNESCO and “Education for All” ) and “Common Core” do sound very appealing on the surface.  Each seeks to educate by teaching the exact same standards to all children (and adults) on a national or a global scale.  But both supercede local control over what is taught to students, and both dismiss the validity and importance of the U.S. Constitution implicitly.

Both UNESCO’s educational goals and Common Core are, coincidentally, heavily funded by activist and philanthropist Bill Gates, one of the wealthiest billionaires on earth.  ( Link to Gates’ Microsoft/Unesco partnership)

Gates gave the Common Core developer/copyright holders, NGA/CCSSO, about $25 million dollars to promote his special interest, Common Core.  (See CCSSO: 2009–$9,961,842, 2009— $3,185,750, 2010–$743,331, 2011–$9,388,911 ; NGA Center: 2008–$2,259,780 at .

Gates partnered with UNESCO/U.N. to fund “Education For All” as well.  See

The “Education For All” developer is UNESCO, a branch of the United Nations.  Education For All’s key document is called “The Dakar Framework for Action: Education For All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments.”  Read the full text here:

At this link, you can learn about how Education For All works:

In a nutshell: “Prior to the reform of the global EFA coordination architecture in 2011-2012, the Education for All High-Level Group brought together high-level representatives from national governments, development agencies, UN agencies, civil society and the private sector. Its role was to generate political momentum and mobilize financial, technical and political support towards the achievement of the EFA goals and the education-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). From 2001-2011 the High-Level Group met annually.”

   The six goals of “Education For All” are claimed to be internationally agreed-upon. But since much of what happens with the United Nations threatens the sovereignty of the United States and all sovereign nations, I do not recognize that these goals, or anything else for that matter, are “internationally agreed-upon.”  Do you?

For everyone on earth to totally agree, we’d have to submit to a one-world government with a one-world constitution that would override any individual country’s constitution.  There are some great thoughts on this subject here:

But in the U.N.’s own words:

“Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.  Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.  The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up…” See:

So Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken by everyone.  We all apparently have been signed up to agree, whether we agree or not.  I’m already getting the communist creeps.

But most of us haven’t even heard of Agenda 21 nor do we know anything about “sustainable development”.

On the linked Education and Awareness page of that same U.N. website, we learn:

Education, Public  Awareness and Training is the focus of Chapter 36 of Agenda 21. This is a cross-sectoral theme both relevant to the implementation of the whole of Agenda 21 and indispensable for achieving sustainable development.”

Did you get that?  Education is indispensable for the U.N. to get its agenda pushed onto every citizen worldwide.  They just admitted it out loud.  They want a strong hand in determining what is taught worldwide.

So then we click on Chapter 36.  The “indispensable” implementation tool they are describing are your children’s American public schools.  Yes, really:

36.2 says they plan to “reorient” worldwide education toward sustainable development.  (No discussion, no vote, no input needed on this reorientation plan, apparently.)

36.3 says:  “While basic education provides the underpinning for any environmental and development education, the latter needs to be incorporated as an essential part of learning. Both formal and non-formal education are indispensable to changing people’s attitudes so that they have the capacity to assess and address their sustainable development concerns. It is also critical for achieving environmental and ethical awareness, values and attitudes, skills and behaviour consistent with sustainable development and for effective public participation in decision-making. To be effective, environment and development education should deal with the dynamics of both the physical/biological and socio-economic environment and human (which may include spiritual) development, should be integrated in all disciplines, and should employ formal and non-formal methods

The take-away?

  • Environmental education will be incorporated in formal education globally.
  • Any value or attitude held by anyone globally that stands independent to that of the United Nations’ definition of “sustainable education” must change.  Current attitudes are unacceptable.
  • Environmental education will be belief-and-spirituality based.
  • Environmental education will be integrated into all disciplines, not just science.

The stated objectives (36.4) include endorsing “Education for All,” achieving “environmental and development awareness in all sectors of society on a world-wide scale as soon as possible”; and to achieve the accessibility of environmental and development education, linked to social education, from primary school age through adulthood to all groups of people; and to promote integration of environment concepts, including demography, in all educational programmes, and “giving special emphasis to the further training of decision makers at all levels.”

Does that not sound like quite an agenda?

But it gets worse.

Under “Activities,” we find:

Governments should strive to update or prepare strategies aimed at integrating environment and development as a cross-cutting issue into education at all levels within the next three years. This should be done in cooperation with all sectors of society…. A thorough review of curricula should be undertaken to ensure a multidisciplinary approach, with environment and development issues and their socio-cultural and demographic aspects and linkages.”

So, if a country like the USA, for example, has a Constitution and G.E.P.A. laws that states that its federal government has absolutely no legal right to supervise or direct state school systems, then what?  How can it be done?

 I’ll tell you how!   Just get a U.S. President to circumvent Congress and the states’ right to educate.  Just use nongovernmental groups like the NGA/CCSSO to write and copyright new national educational standards.  Just pay groups to do what you are not legally authorized to do. Just create “Race to the Top” grants.  Just promote a socialist education system but call it a state-led Common Core.  Then get zillionaire philanthropist Bill Gates to promote and pay for most of it.

And that is what has happened.

Enough info for today?  Oh, no.  Not even close.

They go on to say how countries should pay for all the reorientation and values/attitudes changing for all people.  And there’s even a media-to-museum rebranding blitz outline:

In 36.10:

“Countries… should promote a cooperative relationship with the media, popular theatre groups, and entertainment and advertising industries by initiating discussions to mobilize their experience in shaping public behaviour and consumption patterns and making wide use of their methods. Such cooperation would also increase the active public participation in the debate on the environment. UNICEF should make child-oriented material available to media as an educational tool, ensuring close cooperation between the out-of-school public information sector and the school curriculum, for the primary level. UNESCO, UNEP and universities should enrich pre-service curricula for journalists on environment and development topics;


(f) Countries, in cooperation with the scientific community, should establish ways of employing modern communication technologies for effective public outreach. National and local educational authorities and relevant United Nations agencies should expand, as appropriate, the use of audio-visual methods, especially in rural areas in mobile units, by producing television and radio programmes for developing countries, involving local participation, employing interactive multimedia methods and integrating advanced methods with folk media;

(g) Countries should promote… environmentally sound leisure and tourism activities… making suitable use of museums, heritage sites, zoos, botanical gardens, national parks…”

So, it should be pretty clear that there is a huge re-education program happening to all countries, the aim of which is to change people’s attitudes toward believing in “sustainable development” and environmental education.  If it’s picking up litter, some other innocuous program, fine; spend trillions without taking a vote to make sure we all think alike.  Stupid but harmless.  On the other hand,  what if, what IF, it’s something we DON’T all agree upon? There are hundreds of countries.  Even if it were just up to China* vs. the U.S. to define “sustainable behavior” how would we ever agree?  Paper or plastic?  Paper wastes trees; plastic creates landfills.  These “green-defining” issues are endless.

But the problem, in a nutshell, is simply:  Whose version of “sustainable” do you want to re-educate everyone to believe –assuming that you can accept massive-scale propagandizing for the promotion of one single belief system, under which people didn’t get a representative vote)

*Sustainable thinking includes limiting by abortion the number of babies allowed to be born, in order to have control over population growth. The Chinese “One Child Policy” was introduced by the Chinese Government in 1979 with the intention of keeping the population within sustainable limits even in the face of natural disasters and poor harvests, and improving the quality of life for the Chinese population as a whole. Under the policy, parents who have more than one child may have their wages reduced and be denied some social services.” (BBC)

33 responses to “Does U.N.’s Agenda 21 Education Mandate Push Common Core in USA?

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Thank you so much for writing this article! I have been amazed about the things have learned about Common. Core, and I have been trying to share this knowledge with neighbors and members of my own school board. I have been astonished at the reaction. I can’t believe how many parents and educators have told me that they are willing to give up a little bit of control in education to the federal Governement as long a their child gets a better education. I want to scream every time they say this to me because I know they are not going to be getting better education. I feel like I have no choice but to homeschool so I can protect my kids from all the propaganda. As a parent, I can’t tell you how thankful I am that you ladies are fighting so hard against Common Core. I am trying my best to educate as many people as I can and I write letters to the governor and Utah State School Board. You are definitely not alone in this fight, and I pray that many more people will join in this fight!

    • Thank you, Kimberly. We cherish every note, emails and phone call from people nationwide who are waking up and want to join the effort. It is comforting to know that many more people are learning what is happening so that together, we can fight against that top-down agenda, for what is good and right under the Constitution.

    • Kimberly, please contact me by e-mail: – I am in the fight here in Montana, and would like to collaborate with you.

      Christel, thanks for your important work on this. Please see my blog post:

    • What you are really learning about is UN Agenda 21. Common Core is just one of the tools to complete the Agenda of complete inventory and control of every human activity by the UN and our own government sold us out to the UN many years ago but the most agregious was Bill Clinton both by creating the PCSD and later his education for sustainability policy. He also repealed Glass Steigel just to help tank the economy. It was Clinton’s administration policy that crashed the economy. It generally take 10 years to feel the full affect of the previous administration good and bad. Clinton realized the benefits of the Reagan administration and we have been feeling the ramifications of the Clinton administration but instead of making this better Obama has made them worse.

  2. Thank you again for all your research. I too appreciate all you are doing and want to do more myself. I was wondering if you were ever able to meet with Governor Herbert again, after the Republican Convention in April. I recall that he promised a follow-up meeting.

  3. I’ve been trying to warn people about this for years. It’s not just IB that is poisoning the kids’ minds, but UNESCO is into our business, all of it!

    • You can thank Reagan for have the foresight to withdraw the US from UNESCO in 1984 and you can kick Bush in the head for joining us back with UNESCO in 2003. Believe me it was not a coincidence. The move was intentional. 2002 NCLB, 2003 back with UNESCO, 2004 Gates signs agreement with UNESCO, 2014 NCLB sunsets and Decade of Education for Sustainable Development ends. And there is more but this gives you an idea.

  4. Check this website for total UN education.

  5. Very disgusting indeed – unbelievable – America will NOT be destroyed by all this nonsense !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. Pingback: The War on Education: Obama Is Bribing States To Adopt A Nationalized Education Curriculum « 4 Liberty Sake

  7. Pingback: Does U.N.’s Agenda 21 Education Mandate Push Common Core in USA? | Are We Aware Yet? Political News Blog-Current News Political News Blog

  8. Know Your Enemy (Part 65 – The World Core Curriculum)

    “more education increases the threat to sustainability – you can’t make this up.
    Youtube: Agenda 21 For Dummies

    – 67-The War on Parents ( and the UN handbook for teachers)

  9. Watch the UN’s Agenda 21 in actionon another front, this is happening around the world:

    youtube: Sheriff Dean Wilson – Defend Rural America:

    Does anyone remember how Bush jr quickly hushed up any call to de-fund the UN and kick them out of the US when the UN’s food for oil scandal was exposed?

    When will the connection finally be made regarding austerity, the UN, world banksters and the NWO?

    When a simple to understand connect is made by the masses regarding the agenda of the UN, it’s cost in taxes, lost freedoms and sovereignty of the world’s citizens, then we can stop this collapse into the NWO and regain freedom and prosperity, not to mention get control over NATO.

    “The UN & its agencies are immune to laws of countries where they operate” – Wikipedia, WHY IS THIS?

    How many UN ‘agencies’ enjoy this immunity from law and don’t pay any tax? WHY, anything to do with “supranational sovereignty of the intellectual elite and world bankers” speech by David Rockfeller? The Rockefellers are big UN sources of revenue.
    “The Headquarters occupies a site beside the East River, on 17 acres (69,000 m2) of land purchased from the foremost New York real estate developer of the time, William Zeckendorf, Sr. Nelson Rockefeller arranged this purchase, after an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate of Kykuit was rejected as being too isolated from Manhattan. The US$8.5 million purchase was then funded by his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who donated it to the city.[6] Wallace Harrison, the personal architectural adviser for the Rockefeller family, and a prominent corporate architect, served as the Director of Planning for the United Nations Headquarters. His firm, Harrison and Abramovitz, oversaw the execution of the design.[7]” – Wikipedia

    “… an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate of Kykuit was rejected as being too isolated from Manhattan.” ???

    And maybe also give the appearance of a conflict of interest?

    World citizens, wake up to the UN!

    “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years…. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national determination practiced in past centuries.”

    – David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, June 1991 Baden, Germany

    The IMF & World Bank are UN agencies (google it) & it’s sovereign eating un-elected dictator technocrats are UN agents… >that pay no fek’n tax. Do you think the UN is there for you?

    “In fact, her IMF salary of $467,940 plus an $83,760 additional allowance is not subject to any taxes. See Christine Lagarde, Scourge of Tax Evaders, Pays No Tax. No taxes is the norm for most United Nations employees …”

    This UN, who’s membership includes 3rd world tyrannical dictatorships-easily bought by the bankers & dynastic families) is trying to dis-arm Americans & spread western wealth to themselves through UN resolutions and increasingly an arm of NATO and drones, has already control over our parks, water (google it and wake up) & is well into forcing carbon taxes, Agenda 21 & smart meters down your throat, seize your property, shackle you with regulations, eliminate gun rights and other freedoms…. and who’s agency’s INCLUDE THE IMF AND WORLD BANK.

    Expose the UN, audit the UN and all it’s agencies, freeze all UN activites, have congressional hearings regarding the UN’s Agenda 21. Call congressional hearings regarding the EPA handing 2.5 million US tax dollars to the the United Nation University for Sustainablilty and Peace.

  10. The UN seems to be also getting ‘back door’ funding as the world is going broke:

    EPA boosts research into E-waste solution

    By Martin Leggett – 01 May 2011 14:0:0 GMT – See more at:

    The EPA in the USA is now working ‘internationally’ (INTERNATIONALLY’?) with the UN; the EPA has awarded a five-year, $2.5 million grant (US citizen’s taxes) to the UNU Institute for Sustainability and Peace (UNU-ISP)…and where the fek did the EPA get the money?…you’ve been taxed to fund UNU since 1972, how’s that ‘sustainablility and peace’ going UNU? How many of these UNU professors and administrators are now retired with tax funded pensions? For accomplishing what?

    The EPA can ‘deem’ law now (see below).

    How are they back door feeding the UN in your country? Did they first mention that to the people freezing in New Jersey? This is (actually ‘you will’ pay) to clean up ‘e-trash’ around the world (around the world?), at least that is what they are telling us what the money is for. So, the USA is providing the world’s libraries with $6,000 (each, google it) Kindles that is creating “e-trash and now US tax payers are also the world’s trash collectors? “for Sustainability and Peace” right.
    …and this:

    ‘Should Law Enforcement Agencies Have The Power To Write And Enforce Whatever Laws They Desire?’ Posted on August 4, 2011 “This is how unelected bureaucrats, such as those in the EPA, can write law that wasn’t necessarily intended by the Congress. We see it all the time. A good example are the recent new regulations being promulgated by the EPA to control carbon emissions from power generating plants that effectively will enforce a carbon cap-and-trade law that the Congress has in fact already rejected.”

    The EPA, along with destroying businesses, granting millions of tax dollars to the UNU-ISP (UN), is about to destroy home ownership.

    I would love to be a ‘fly on the wall’ at the next Blackstone meeting after they get wind of this:

    “Additional costs will be added to how new homes are built, whereas the sales of older homes can be stopped in their tracks until they meet stringent government codes.”

    “The new federal EPA, HUD and DOE home regulations filter down to local inspectors who are required by law to impose them or fail the home inspection. Unnecessary and unreasonable code can be imposed on homeowners who find they “can’t fight code.” There is virtually no appeal.”

    “…the Environmental Protection Agency will have power to force many homeowners to virtually rebuild their homes to meet stringent environmental requirements before they can sell them. Living in a house that does not meet the EPA’s “green” regulations for roofing, windows, doors, insulation or heating and cooling systems will be slapped with fines. Electrical companies are now installing “smart monitoring systems” to track usage of energy by residents.”

    (This is part of a much bigger plan, when thousands of people are forced to ‘walk away’, and that includes the hedge funds like Blackstone that have been buying thousands of single family homes, the federal government will ‘have no choice’ but to seize the properties -(Agenda 21. IMHO)

    Homeowners vs. EPA Home Invasion

    Posted: 11 Feb 2013 04:02 PM PST
    By: Sharon Sebastian

    Time to connect all the dots>

    The EPA and the rest of the federal regulatory agencies and Obama’s 32 czars are working more for the advancement of the UN’s take over of America than for the American taxpayers.

  11. Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well
    written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will certainly comeback.

  12. Pingback: Common Core 1 | glauners99

  13. unfortunately many of your links are now unavailable. did you download, get copies or screenshots?
    can you post them?

  14. Pingback: Does U.N.’s Agenda 21 Education Mandate Push Common Core in USA? | tulsafacts

  15. I enjoy what you guys are up too. This sort of clever work and coverage!
    Keep up the wonderful works guys I’ve included you guys to blogroll.

  16. Hi there, its fastidious article concerning media print, we all be aware of media is a
    fantastic source of data.

  17. Pingback: Common Core Based On UN Education Program and Agenda 21 - The Brenner Brief | The Brenner Brief

  18. Pingback: Common Core Based On UN Education Program and Agenda 21 | World Chaos

  19. Howdy! This blog post could not be written
    any better! Going through this post reminds me of my
    previous roommate! He constantly kept preaching about this.
    I most certainly will send this post to him. Pretty sure he’ll have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  20. Pingback: Common Core: UNESCO and Bill Gates timeline to federalized education reform in US | Bradley County News

  21. Just FYI…the link under, how Education Works For All is an error.

  22. Our minecraft force op tool has entirely
    changed just how minecraft servers work. An administration feels they
    are really the only types which will management their host.
    They are incorrect! With the minecraft force op instrument, you can now consider complete
    control of the hosting server and do with it, as you may you should.
    You can even strike the other administration!

  23. If possibly you paint your head’s hair, you may obtain a cost-effective hair painting
    for any couple of bucks, its surely not high-priced in any way,
    then you may really start off searching great! . For those who
    have the particular curly hair color then thats
    an advantage plus a dilemma much less to concern yourself with.
    In the future you will wish to uncover the essential naruto costume, on account of the extra head
    of hair which it truly is got surrounding the the neck and throat, you could get a thing kind a sister or perhaps a cosing or possibly some girl it becomes clear that appears to be to have got
    a new sweater or some matter akin to what has got the
    specific frizzy hair details, then this only situation left over may be that will put a lot of
    orange costume have on more than this to be certain the hairs go on top of the top of the orange shirts or attire producing it appear and also think that this were actually one.

  24. Pingback: Global history of common core. | stopcommoncorenys

  25. Pingback: WYBI: Global Ed for All Through 2030?! | commoncorediva

Comments are welcome here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: