———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Sandra Stotsky
I’d like to guide you to a few specific places for evidence relative to your concerns about literature and instruction in English Language Arts (ELA) and how the Utah Core Standards are focused on creating a culture of literacy in schools.
of literature with the reading of informational texts, including texts in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects…” The level and quality of reading informational text in all subjects is a critical element of creating independent readers who can read and understand a wide variety of texts that are present in career and college settings.
“Ode on a Grecian Urn” by John Keats (1820)
Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (1848)
“Because I Could Not Stop for Death” by Emily Dickinson (1890)
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald (1925)
Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston (1937)
A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry (1959)
The Namesake by Jhumpa Lahiri (2003)Literary Non-Fiction:
Common Sense by Thomas Paine (1776)
Walden by Henry David Thoreau (1854)
“Society and Solitude” by Ralph Waldo Emerson (1857)
“The Fallacy of Success” by G. K. Chesterton (1909)
Black Boy by Richard Wright (1945)
“Politics and the English Language” by George Orwell (1946)
“Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry” by Rudolfo Anaya (1995)
These selections have merit for their content and their writing. An ELA teacher has the opportunity to link themes and subjects across the full range of literary choices: novels, poems, dramatic works, essays, speeches, memoirs, etc. As an English teacher, I always tried to provide a variety of reading choices for students. Great literary works are how we understand other people, other times, and other cultures. Students need examples of many kinds of great writing.
In Appendix B, found here http://www.schools.utah.gov/CURR/langartsec/Language-Arts-Secondary-Home/APPENDIX-B.aspx, the Standards provide a list of exemplary texts. (These are not required texts, but rather examples of appropriate reading selections.) Please look at the Table of Contents, beginning on page 5, for a listing of readings organized by grade level. You will notice informational readings are included in addition to stories and poetry. Informational reading is an important part of helping students answer questions and learn content in the elementary classroom. However, the topics and presentation are interesting and grade-appropriate. At the elementary level, all subjects are generally taught in the same classroom and by the same teacher, so a wider range of topics is included in these lists.
You’ll notice that by the grades 6-8, the examples of Informational texts have been grouped by content area (ELA, History/Social Studies, and Science, Mathematics, and Technical Subjects); the ELA texts are literary nonfiction. And, you will probably also notice that the lists of fiction and poetry contain many of your favorites—there are certainly many of mine, including Chaucer, Faulkner, Hemingway, and Shakespeare.
I completely and fundamentally agree with your statement, beautifully written: “Great writing creates great writers. We learn how to write best from studying great literature. We learn about shared values. We learn the consequences of both good and bad choices without having to experiment personally. We learn about our rich culture and heritage when we study the works of Robert Frost and Emily Dickinson and others.” And when I look at the suggested readings in the Standards, these readings are reflected. They are the study of English and Language Arts.
I am not sure from whence the claim that we are replacing literature with “tracts from the EPA” or “dry technical writing” stems. As you have seen in the Standards, the writing is high-quality, appropriate, and interesting.
The Standards outline reading in all the content areas, including writing created by and for scientists, historians, engineers…every field has writing and communication that is important to the work that field supports. While I might not pick up a computer programming manual to read for fun, I know that there are many people who would, and I’m grateful that we are all different in our interests and reading. I am also glad that teachers in all the content areas will choose appropriate informational texts for their students to read and develop content knowledge and communication fluency. As a concerted effort, as a collaborative school, students will have the opportunity to read and learn what they will need to know in our society.
And I will always believe that includes Macbeth and To Kill a Mockingbird.
Thank you for your concern. I hope that examining the evidence—the actual Standards document—has assured you that students in Utah are reading high-quality literature in their ELA classrooms—and reading high-quality writing in all the content areas.
Tiffany Hall, MA, M.Ed.
K-12 Literacy Coordinator
Teaching and Learning
Utah State Office of Education
Please note: Utah has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state employees regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your email communication may be subject to public disclosure.
While I am not a fan of common core and have spoken against it personally to the state board–this post is not your best. Writing and reading across the curriculum has been in place for years. It has proven very successful, especially with team teaching (a group of teachers working together with the same students; usually history, English and science teachers) as most of our students are not entertainment readers. In your haste to brand all things evil, please remember that not every single thing about the Common Core standards are awful.
I’m really confused by the percentage issue. Can someone explain what we are talking about? The 70/30 or 50/50 split is a percentage of WHAT? Pages read? Material read? Instruction given on materials read? Average reading time? What does the percentage mean practically speaking? And how is it enforceable?
Click to access SocraticTIEConference2012.pdf
regarding literature, take a look at this document for many reasons, but I am pinpointing 2. one relates to this post and you will note in this document the lyrics to the Eagles song, Hotel California used in place of literature, as well as I have seen in other documents not handy, the use of rap lyrics, so illiterate, by Eminem and others in place of classic. with the expressed effort to continue the perverse quest for a mass of idiots who have little skill or expertise.
this is driven home by Elizabeth Coleman ( mother of David Coleman) in her TED talk. she says there is just too much expertise….
and the Common Core is code for common cognitive restructuring through nationalized education
http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/as-powerful-as-a-religious-conversion-bestowing-deep-understandings-for-their-revolutionary-effects/#comment-264167
you will find techniques rife through the curriculum and its design and implementation and instruction to teachers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_restructuring
fyi, I only meant for links to come up, it seems they automatically embed, Sorry!
Pingback: The Perfect Plan To Destroy America – Nationalize Education | VOICES EMPOWER
Pingback: Dr. Sandra Stotsky’s June 2015 Testimony at Bridgewater State University – Public Hearing | COMMON CORE
choleslo reviews – best natural cholesterol lowering supplement
Pingback: THE PERFECT PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA -- NATIONALIZE EDUCATION | EducationNews
Pingback: The Jackson Press – THE PERFECT PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA ¬ NATIONALIZE EDUCATION