Math Teacher Stephanie Sawyer on Common Core Standards   8 comments

Math Teacher Stephanie Sawyer

speaks out about the weak math in Common Core Standards.

Math Teacher Stephanie Sawyer was quoted on Diane Ravitch’s website saying the following about Common Core:

“…They pay lip service to actually practicing standard algorithms.

Seriously, students don’t have to be fluent in addition and subtraction with the standard algorithms until 4th grade?

I teach high school math. I took a break to work in the private sector from 2002 to 2009. Since my return, I have been stunned by my students’ lack of basic skills. How can I teach algebra 2 students about rational expressions when they can’t even deal with fractions with numbers?

Please don’t tell me this is a result of the rote learning that goes on in grade- and middle-school math classes, because I’m pretty sure that’s not what is happening at all. If that were true, I would have a room full of students who could divide fractions. But for some reason, most of them can’t, and don’t even know where to start.

I find it fascinating that students who have been looking at fractions from 3rd grade through 8th grade still can’t actually do anything with them. Yet I can ask adults over 35 how to add fractions and most can tell me. And do it. And I’m fairly certain they get the concept. There is something to be said for “traditional” methods and curriculum when looked at from this perspective.

Grade schools have been using Everyday Math and other incarnations for a good 5 to 10 years now, even more in some parts of the country. These are kids who have been taught the concept way before the algorithm, which is basically what the Common Core seems to promote. I have a 4th grade son who attends a school using Everyday Math. Luckily, he’s sharp enough to overcome the deficits inherent in the program. When asked to convert 568 inches to feet, he told me he needed to divide by 12, since he had to split the 568 into groups of 12. Yippee. He gets the concept. So I said to him, well, do it already! He explained that he couldn’t, since he only knew up to 12 times 12. But he did, after 7 agonizing minutes of developing his own iterated-subtraction-while-tallying system, tell me that 568 inches was 47 feet, 4 inches. Well, he got it right. But to be honest, I was mad; he could’ve done in a minute what ended up taking 7. And he already got the concept, since he knew he had to divide; he just needed to know how to actually do it. From my reading of the common core, that’s a great story. I can’t say I feel the same.

If Everyday Math and similar programs are what is in store for implementing the common core standards for math, then I think we will continue to see an increase in remedial math instruction in high schools and colleges. Or at least an increase in the clientele of the private tutoring centers, which do teach basic math skills.”

About these ads

8 responses to “Math Teacher Stephanie Sawyer on Common Core Standards

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Pingback: Hogwash Alert: “National Review” on Common Core | COMMON CORE

  2. Pingback: “Hogwash Alert to National Review Online”

  3. Pingback: Teachers Speak Out, Some Resign Over Common Core | COMMON CORE

  4. Pingback: Regarding Common Core: “Hogwash Alert to National Review Online” | Are We Aware Yet? Political News Blog-Current News Political News Blog

  5. Pingback: Common Core Curriculum and Agenda 21 | lisaleaks

  6. Thanks to the admin for sharing your such a nice blog.I am really nostalgic to read this blog. I have remember my school days specially the speech of my favorite math teacher Mrs.Rosy. She plays a great role in my life.I can’t understand the equation of math but according to her help I can solution my every problem of math. Really I can’t forget her support any cost.

  7. Pingback: HOGWASH ALERT TO NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE | Education News

  8. There needs to be a balance. The reason there is now an emphasis on the conceptual is that for years it was just drill and skill. Students could do your long algorithm, but had no underlying understanding of why or how it worked. We wanted students to understand, not just memorize. It comes down to the teacher and how he/she balances the approach and moves children toward the link between the conceptual and the algorithm.

Comments are welcome here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,058 other followers

%d bloggers like this: