White House ConnectED: Phase Out Printed Textbooks   7 comments

connected

I already had a sense of growing nausea attached to my observations of locals’ infatuation with technology-centric schooling.

It got worse when I read the latest White House fact sheet on Obama’s ConnectEd plan.  Utah’s perfectly in line with  D.C. –the cool people are dumping the old fashioned notion of using books in schools to spend gobs and gobs and gobbledy-gob-gobs on technology.

Both the left wing (Obama’s ConnectEd plan) and the right wing (Jeb Bush’s Digital Learning Now) plan to gobbledy-gob our tax dollars on Common Corealigned,  Common Data Standards-aligned technologies –always provided by the same little money-gobbling  clique.

Even embedded in the Common Core tests and curriculum is the trendy party line that books are out –because technology is in.

I’m not against technology.  I’m against foolishness.

Technology is a great, glittering servant. But it’s a terrible master.  Its imperfections can be disastrous.  But in Obama’s version of reality, it has no flaws and it deserves our full (tax dollar) attention.

In the White House fact sheet on President Obama’s ConnectED “Plan for Connecting all Schools to the Digital Age”  we read that traditional education, the kind that our parents, grandparents and great-grandparents were raised with, is to be discarded for solely technology-based education:

“Our schools were designed for a different era – based on a limited school day and a seasonal calendar. This system does not take into account the constant learning opportunities of global connectivity…”

(Recall that Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has been saying for many years that he wants students to attend school 6-7 days per week,  up to 14 hours per day, all year round. If you haven’t seen it before, watch that video clip here.)

ConnectED sounds appealing on the surface: upgraded connectivity, reaching out to rural students, exposing students and teachers to new technology.  It even appears, on first reading, that ConnectEd promotes local control: “purchasing choices remain in the hands of local educational leaders,” it says.

But remember: when the Gates-owned “Microsoft and its hardware partners unveiled a range of devices at various price points to help U.S. public schools make the digital transition,”  it promised: “all of the devices are Common Core testing compliant“.  Is there any actual choice here?

Common Educational Data Standards (CEDS) is the unshakable shadow to Common Core State Standards (CCSS) –both of which which ConnectEd depends upon, and both CEDS and CCSS come from the same people:  The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) –a private, unelected, nontransparent club of superintendents, financially backed by Gates.

CEDS common data standards ensure that all state databases (aka SLDS) match one another, and that all student and teacher information is fully labeled and compare-able.  Thus, there is no room for true diversity among states/schools in this system; no true freedom of thought, no true competitive soaring, just sameness.  And because CEDS are used in every state’s longitudinal database, are interoperable with the federal EdFacts Data Exchange, and are no longer protected by federal privacy law, it means also: no guarantee of student data privacy.

Fact:  “A continued commitment to disaggregation” of student data is a central goal of the CCSSO Council.  These facts make national school interoperability and connectivity sound a lot less peachy.

Still, the Obama and Jeb Bush clique is pushing for a one-size-fits-all national, matching technology system.  We are not just to receive the good things touted, like upgraded connectivity and new technology for kids;  we are also getting shackled to the CEDS/NCES data collecting system and to the Common Core testing system, and to the corporate educational products that are aligned to these systems.

Additionally, under the misleading subheading “Restoring U.S. Leadership in Vital Areas” the ConnectEd fact sheet touts the end of using actual books in schools, as a good thing.

“The United States is now falling behind… In South Korea, all schools are connected to the internet with high-speed connections, all teachers are trained in digital learning, and printed textbooks will be phased out by 2016.”

rose book

Why the hurry?  Are people afraid that if they question the race to “phase out books,” they will be labeled “against progress” and out of touch?  Are we backwards if we raise an eyebrow at the mad rush toward every student being hooked up to the internet?  What are the unintended consequences and opportunity costs of phasing out books and tangible libraries to bring about the brave new unvetted vision of Bill Gates, Marc Tucker, Sir Michael Barber, Obama and Bush?

Studies show that reading a paper-and-ink book is a better, more lasting learning experience than reading electronically.   For sobering reasons, top Silicon Valley computer experts send their children to technology-free schools.  Education systems can suffer when so many eggs are placed in one basket– and the basket falls. When we become overly reliant on technology, when technology is hacked or when it breaks; when it’s philosophically hijacked by software designers employed by narrow minded politicians, or when it is aligned with consent-less data mining,  what then?

Remember the smell of a book and the feeling of paper.  Are books suddenly worthless because they are not speedy, networked and electronic? If we don’t invest philosophically and financially in books, soon there won’t be many around.   

Please wake up, American leaders and Utah leaders.  We can find solutions for increased technology, free from the Obama-Bush-Gates clique’s narrow vision.

Let’s hold on to real books, real libraries, and the time-tested culture of academic  freedom and student data privacy.  Let’s shake off the chains of  common data, common testing, and common data mining that will bind our children down.

 

 books qu

7 responses to “White House ConnectED: Phase Out Printed Textbooks

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Thank you! It’s just another example of bureaucrats mindlessly making political decisions without a care for the “unintended” consequences. I don’t think I believe any more that much of the consequences are unintentional at all!

    One friendly criticism of your awesome article, Christel – progressives have worked hard to take over the language, forever changing the meaning of perfectly good words like, “rigor” and, well, “progressive,” so I think we need to make a conscious effort to choose our words very carefully. Most people these days believe that the people we elect to government are our “leaders” when they are absolutely not. They are the hired help to whom we have delegated our authority to represent us in our government. We hire a manager to help us run a business we own but we would never even consider treating them or allowing them to believe they have authority over us. If they’re not doing their job to our satisfaction, they must be replaced or we may lose our livelihood. We really need to call them what they are: representatives or delegates. Never, never “leader,” lest the tail will forever wag the dog.

  2. Well said.

  3. We have got to get a collation of parents from all the states and repeal this. Get a lawyer, pull our kids out of school. They are taking our tax dollars. We didn’t ask for this. Unqualified people put Common Core together pushed it into our school and now we have to accept it to questions asked. This is unconstitutional illegal and MUST BE STOPPED. http://article.wn.com/view/2014/11/19/LETTER_Local_officials_right_to_stand_up_against_Common_Core/

  4. Thank you for this post Christel Swasey. I’m in New Mexico which seems to be a little behind Utah in Common Core implementation, but also in awareness unfortunately. I had already been following the changes being made in Common Core aligned text books, the most treacherous changes being, in my opinion, to the history books. By phasing out textbooks it seems obvious parents will have even less access to review the indoctrination of the Common Core curriculum. Too many people will believe the lies defending this is as a good thing-that the intent of it is to “save more trees” for example. I pulled my 16 daughter out of public schools last year, but I have 3 little grandchildren in the system who I fear for. In fact, I fear for all of today’s children.

  5. Pingback: Federal Control of Technology and Data: On “Internet Neutrality,”the ConnectEd Initiative, and SETRA | COMMON CORE

  6. This is a great article! Gates and Pearson are bribing a few teachers with all expense paid trips to participate in conferences, i.e. ECET, ISTE, New Orleans, etc, where they are wined and dined to push their agenda. These are the failed classroom teachers, the technology people or just the blind who are narcissistic that are participating. Clearly the educational system is top heavy and could eliminate a few administrative positions. Follow these folks on twitter. They tweet all day instead of teaching the children. They refer to our children as theirs and love to self validate themselves and falsely validate others. They post picture and videos of our children without permission. They have our children intersect with others like them in other states on google hangouts, without parental permission. It is clear, some have mental health issues and yet parents have no rights to refuse such activities? This Connected Ed needs to be stopped. Not all kids need to learn how to code. My children are science kids. Someone needs to expose these people and stop them!

Comments are welcome here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: