U.S. Secretary of Ed to News Editors: Spin It Like Duncan   12 comments

Arne Duncan, U.S. Secretary of Education, is angry.

How dare Americans demand freedom from nationalized testing, nationalized standards and data collection?

In yesterday’s speech to the American Society of News Editors, Duncan said:

“…This event has been an opportunity for federal leaders to talk about touchy subjects.  For example, you asked President Kennedy to talk about the Bay of Pigs.  So, thanks for having me here to talk about the Common Core State Standards.  Academic standards used to be just a subject for after-school department meetings and late-night state board sessions. But now, they’re a topic for dueling newspaper editorials. Why? That’s because a new set of standards… are under attack as a federal takeover of the schools…  And your role in sorting out truth from nonsense is really important.”

Indeed it is.

Duncan admits: “… the federal government has nothing to do with curriculum. In fact, we’re prohibited by law from creating or mandating curricula.  So do the reporting. Ask the Common Core critics: Please identify a single lesson plan that the federal government created…Challenge them to produce evidence—because they won’t find it. It simply doesn’t exist”.

Thank you, Secretary Duncan, for pointing this out.

FEDERAL FINGERPRINTS

Federally created lesson plans don’t exist because Duncan’s department has worked so hard to get around the rules (i.e., Constitution) and to make others do the wrongs that the Department then promotes and funds.  The Department’s associates (i.e. Linda Darling-Hammond, Bill Gates, David Coleman) work with Achieve, Inc., with SBAC, with PARCC, with CCSSO, with NGA and others, to collectively produce the federally-approved education “reform” agenda known as the Common Core Initiative. We know this.

But, thanks to Duncan for bringing up the term “lack of evidence.” We’ll get to that.

AUTHORITY, PLEASE

Duncan says: “The Department of Education is prohibited from creating or mandating curricula.”  YES!

Yet the Department has coerced and urged and cajoled  and bribed American educators into joining the Common Core State Standards Initiative, has funded tests upon which these standards are bases, and have mandated that the testing consortia must share student-level data with the federal government concerning Common Core tests. Just see the Cooperative Agreement for oodles of power-grabbing evidence that uses the tests as vehicles.

Duncan says there is no evidence of a federal takeover using Common Core.  Well, almost;  there is no trace of an Department of Education fingerprint on the writing of the national standards, tests and curriculum. This it correct.

But there are massive, unmistakable Department of Education fingerprints all over the promotion, marketing, funding and imposition of the standards on states. These fingerprints are everywhere.

But the Department of Education has been very careful to use other groups as smokescreens for its “reforms” while the Department oversteps its authority. It was the CCSSO/NGA that copyrighted the national standards, not the Department of Education.

It was David Coleman and his four friends who wrote the standards (with token feedback, largely ignored, from others) It was PARCC, SBAC, and AIR that created the common tests.  It was Bill Gates (who partnered with Pearson) to write the lion’s share of the American educational curriculum.  And it is the Department of Education that put a 15% cap on top of those copyrighted standards that they say are state-led.

EVIDENCE, PLEASE

Guess what? There is no evidence that Common Core will do anything it has claimed it can do does not exist– there’s no empirical data, no pilot test, no study to verify claims that the standards will improve diddledy.

We might each ask the reporters to ask for that evidence.

NOT RADICAL/ NOT CURRICULUM

Duncan says that Common Core agenda is “neither radical nor a curriculum.”

I beg to differ.

It is radical to create nationalized, (socialist-styled) testing and standards for schools in a land of liberty.

It is radical to shred the Family Educational Rights Privacy Act (FERPA) as the Department of Education has done, to demote “parental consent” from a privacy-protecting mandate to a “best practice” and to redefine protective terms to make them nonprotective, including “educational agency,” “directory information,” and “authorized representative.”

It is radical to carefully work around the U.S. Constitution and G.E.P.A. law’s prohibitions against federal control of education. For just one example: in the “Cooperative Agreement” between the Department of Ed and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) the federal government demands that states give conferences and phone updates, synchronicity of educational tests, triangulation of collected student-level data under the federal eye, and much more.

 

And Common Core is driving and creating a national curriculum, by encouraging governmental and corporate collusion to narrow and monopolize the educational purchases of the nation.

Duncan tries hard to persuade the American Editors Society in his speech to separate standards and curriculum, yet we all know that standards and curriculum go hand in hand –like frames shape homes, like hands shape gloves, like bones support flesh– standards direct curriculum.

As the main funder of Common Core, Bill Gates, said in his speech at a 2009 Conference of State Legislatures, “Identifying common standards is just the starting point. We’ll only know if this effort has succeeded when the curriculum and tests are aligned to these standards… When the tests are aligned to the Common standards, the curriculum will line up as well…. for the first time, there will be a large, uniform base of customers.” Watch clip here.

WE’RE NOT COLLECTING STUDENT DATA

Duncan also denies the existence of any federal push to collect personal student data. He says that critics, “make even more outlandish claims. They say that the Common Core calls for federal collection of student data. For the record, we are not allowed to, and we won’t.”

No federal collection of student data? What a huge lie. Readers, please fact-check Secretary Duncan yourselves.

Aggregated student data has long been collected federally at the Edfacts Data Exchange. Edfacts states, “EDFacts is a U. S. Department of Education initiative to put performance data at the center of policy, management and budget decisions for all K-12 educational programs. EDFacts centralizes performance data supplied by K-12 state education agencies.” Although the information collected here is aggregated (grouped, not individualized) data, this will change because of the federal requests for more disaggregated (ungrouped, individualized) data.

Here are some federal sites you may click on to verify that the federal government is asking for more and more data points about each individual in our school systems. Click on:

Common Educational Data Standards – click on K12 student and find personally defining words like “identity,” “parent,” “incident,” “contact,” “authentication identity provider.”

National Data Collection Model – under “core entities” you will find “teacher,” “student,” “school,” “bus stop” and other identifying terms.

And Duncan is surely aware that the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) which helped copyright and produce the standards, has a stated commitment to disaggregation of student data.

Lastly. A simple common sense test.

If Arne Duncan were truly concerned about the quality of American schools, if he and his group cared about the education of children and not the controlling and surveillance of populations, then would they not have pushed for tested, piloted standards that would have used, for example, the sky-high standards of Massachusetts as a template, rather than circumventing all voters, circumventing academic tradition, and using this literature-diminishing, algorithm-slowing, cursive-slashing, informational text-pushing, unpiloted experiment called Common Core?

So am I suggesting that this is a diabolical scheme? YES.

Duncan himself used the term in his speech. To make fun of those of us who see it as exactly that.

He quoted columnist Michael Gerson —President Bush’s former speechwriter— who wrote that if the Common Core “is a conspiracy against limited government, it has somehow managed to recruit governors Mitch Daniels and Jeb Bush, current governors Bobby Jindal and Chris Christie, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce… A plot this vast is either diabolical or imaginary.”

Diabolical is the right word.

While Duncan and his education reformers may truly believe that socialism/communism is the way to go, I do not. And if most of America does, then let’s at least vote on it.

If anyone doubts that total governmental control of schools and children, to the detriment of families, is Duncan’s direction, view Duncan’s interview on Charlie Rose, where he outlines his goals for the complete takeover of family life by schools. Schools are to be health clinics, parental education centers, are to be open six or seven days a week and twelve hours or more per day, all year round, as day and night centers of civilization.

Folks, it’s not just standards.

Not by a long shot.

12 responses to “U.S. Secretary of Ed to News Editors: Spin It Like Duncan

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You need to get this in print in the same papers that ran Duncan’s article in order to rebut his BS. Once again you gals knocked this out of the park.

  2. You are exactly right. This is a push to take over the minds of children who will then become socialists/communists, being totally ignorant of what they are doing and will have done to the lives of their children and grandchildren. This is the dummying down of education just as penalizing doctors 27% so that a lot of them will drop out and they can instill their “program” of socialized medicine as well. There will be no more doctors to see, only “Physician assistants” who are NOT doctors, do not have a doctoral degree in medicine and who do not know what your physician knows. My son suffers right now from this action. He fell and tore his ligaments and broke his knee if 5 or 6 places. Small fractures, but fractures anyway. A
    physician’s assistant saw him in the ER, took an x-ray and came in to tell him he had a sprained knee. If it didn’t get better, go see an orthopedic doctor. Needless to say, it did not get better and ne ended up having major surgery to install a new ligament. He then proceeded to throw 2 blood clots, which he had to convince the nurses to call his doctor re. this. He ordered a cat scan and found the 2 clots. He was in the hospital almost a week and had PT for 3 months. He must wear a knee brace for a year. So much for accurate doctoring and diagnosis. The Father of Education ,himself a Communist, stated that he did not have to run for president to instill the communistic government for the US, the democratic party and the American people had already done it for him. WAKE UP AMERICA.

  3. I have only begun to read some of this, but it is helping me to understand how the “standards” are linked to Department of Education. I am currently trying to write an article for our local newspaper and am having a dickens of a time trying to explain this in a couple of sentences. People must have some patience for those trying to explain this, and unfortunately speaking about it in under five minutes doesn’t get you anywhere, just gets others confused. I’ll also be bring a written concern to our school board, as this is an entangled mess to try to convey through words. I will read it of course. However, there are people that I must bump heads with first and am trying to inform myself as much as possible right now. Who should I contact that may answer some questions that I have, if any (I know everyone is busy trying to tell others and convey their concern about this, but if I am unable to get across my concern effectively and to be able to back it up, it will be a battle lost).

    • YoWe need to keep on fighting core. One size does not fit all in education. It is a federal takeover of our children! Everyone should read the book “agenda 21″ this is already happening in our country! Parents will have no say in their children’s lives! School board swill be obsolete!

      Catherine hinzy
  4. Reblogged this on commoncorecommonsense.

  5. Pingback: U.S. Secretary of Ed to News Editors: Spin It Like Duncan | COMMON CORE COMMON SENSE

  6. We need to keep on fighting core. One size does not fit all in education. It is a federal takeover of our children! Everyone should read the book “agenda 21″ this is already happening in our country! Parents will have no say in their children’s lives! School board swill be obsolete!

    Catherine hinzy
  7. Pingback: Manchester Union Leader Editorial Stands Up Against Common Core | COMMON CORE

  8. Pingback: Liar Liar Pants on Fire: Dr. Stotsky Exposes Marc Tucker | COMMON CORE

  9. Pingback: CA School District Sells Student Data to Fundraise for Duncan Visit | COMMON CORE

  10. Pingback: Sec. Arne Duncan Makes a Personal Visit to Utah | COMMON CORE

  11. Pingback: Liar Liar Pants on Fire: Dr. Stotsky Exposes Marc Tucker | Leatherneck Blogger

Comments are welcome here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,109 other followers

%d bloggers like this: