Teacher Professional Development for Common Core   3 comments

The following is published anonymously to protect the educator(s) who are sharing this information.

“Recently certain teachers were selected to attend Common Core training sessions. We were divided according to subject.

We were subjected to “groupthink.”

We were given an article called “Making the Common Core Come Alive!” It is published by an organization called “Just ASK” and it came from that organization’s October 2012 newsletter. The author of the article is Heather Clayton Kwit, who is the principal of Mendon Center Elementary School in Pittsford Central School District, New York.

The article’s main purpose at the top of the article says COMMON CORE MIND SHIFTS. We had to read part of the article and then answer questions about our “feelings.”

Here are the seven mind shifts we had to read about in the meeting:

1. “The goal of curriculum should not be the coverage of content, but rather the discovery of content.” It goes on to say “If done well, Common Core will elevate our teaching to new heights, and emphasize the construction of meaning, while deepening our understanding of our students.”

2. “A deep understanding of the content to be taught is paramount.”

3. “In our classrooms, it is the students’ voices, not the teachers’, that are heard.”

4. “We are preparing our students to do the work without us.”

5. “We are educating our children for an unknown future.” It also says “these skills can then be translated into new or novel situations, without the teacher needing to guide the work.”

6. “We have a responsibility to help each student reach higher.”

7. “We can’t ignore the evidence before us.” It goes on to say the standards were created using an extensive body of evidence.

The concluding paragraph says, “In conclusion, we have the innate ability to change our mindset if it no longer helps us accomplish our goals. Our current beliefs are grounded in the prior knowledge we’ve gained through our administrative and teaching experiences, our lives as students, and our collaboration with educators. Our beliefs impact all that we do, how we act and react, and the potential we see in others. When we can successfully shift our mindset, we are ready to form new lines of thinking and abandon old habits. By doing so, we have successfully positioned ourselves to do the work required by the Common Core.”

Here are the seven questions we had to answer in writing about our feelings about each mind shift (NOTE: these questions were created by OUR system):

1. How would you explain the differences between the discovery of content and the coverage of content?

2. How would you describe the payoff for teachers who demonstrate deep and flexible understanding of the content to be taught?

3. What do you see as the role of the teacher and the students in a classroom filled predominately with student talk?

4. What benefits to you see for students as we begin to teach them to do the work without us?

5. Why would it be important for teachers to shift their thinking about the purpose and method of their practice as they work with students?

6. How will the standards support teachers as they meet the needs of both fragile and accelerated learners?

7. As outlined in this section of the text, what do you see as important pieces of evidence that can’t be ignored? Why should this evidence be considered valuable.

As you can see, this is what teachers are dealing with. So right now, these “reading coaches” from elementary schools are training teachers to be Common Core people in their schools. [Someone] stated that next year our system hopes to fund 19 Common Core IP’s (Instructional Partners). Some of these 19 will be from the “reading coaches” in elementary schools and some will be selected from the secondary level.

Probably, the people who “shift their minds” the best will be the ones selected.”

-  –  –  –  –  –  –  –  –  –  –  -

Thank you to the educator(s) who shared this information with us anonymously here.

About these ads

3 responses to “Teacher Professional Development for Common Core

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Christel, are the educators you got this from in Utah?

  2. Truth is – in Indiana, teachers have been involved all along… they can choose what ever curriculum they desire as long as it addresses common core standards and – this was not a government mandate. 47 states came together (with their teachers and leaders) to develop common core. Considering that most states largest school corporations have a minimum of 40% mobility and/or are not delivering to their state standards … Common Core makes sense. I have tons of reearch/data, etc. to support the direction. Indiana adopted Common Core nearly 2 years ago, so we should be in tthe curriculum mapping/alignment phase. Jo Blacketor (grandparent/IDOE board member)

Comments are welcome here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,136 other followers

%d bloggers like this: